Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Recent Comments
- Stephen Brodsky on Harming Children: Uncovering and Overcoming Bias When Defending Sex Crimes Against Children
- Laura on Courtroom Attire: Ensuring Witness Attire Makes the Right Statement
- Members selection — Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog — February 22, 2014 on Why Do We Ask Jurors To Promise That They Will Do the Impossible?
- Video: Pryor Greed and Lawyers | Parents Rights Blog on Ethical Issues in Racial Profiling
- On the relationship between ideological and demographic diversity on Inaccuracy in Political Self-Perception: Young Adults Are Not as Conservative as They Believe
- Taylor Bishop on Tips for Preparing the Expert Witness
- Thanks for stopping by…. « The Jury Room on Book Review- Social Media as Evidence: Cases, Practice Pointers, and Techniques
- Thanks for stopping by…. « The Jury Room on Book Review: The Juror Factor: Race and Gender in America’s Civil Courts
Bias Archive
-
![Few trials involving child sexual abuse have reached the level of notoriety as United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (2021). Maxwell was convicted of five counts of child sex trafficking stemming from her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors. But a month later, a juror in her case […]](https://thejuryexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/image002-201x130.jpg "Jurors’ Own History of Child Sexual Abuse is Related to their Reactions to Child Victims and Case Judgments")
Jurors’ Own History of Child Sexual Abuse is Related to their Reactions to Child Victims and Case Judgments
Posted on May 22, 2023 | No CommentsFew trials involving child sexual abuse have reached the level of notoriety as United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (2021). Maxwell was convicted of five counts of child sex trafficking stemming from her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors. But a month later, a juror in her case […] -
![When the average American conjures up thoughts regarding the use of mental insanity as a legal defense, s/he might recall a famous instance such as the trial of John Hinckley Jr. who attempted to assassinate then-President Ronald Reagan (United States v. Hinckley, 1981). Although this case was fundamental in changing […]](https://thejuryexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/mentallyillthumb.png "How Individual Differences Relate to Attitudes Toward the Mentally Ill: Implications for Trial Lawyers")
How Individual Differences Relate to Attitudes Toward the Mentally Ill: Implications for Trial Lawyers
by Charles P. Edwards and Monica K. MillerPosted on May 31, 2018 | No CommentsWhen the average American conjures up thoughts regarding the use of mental insanity as a legal defense, s/he might recall a famous instance such as the trial of John Hinckley Jr. who attempted to assassinate then-President Ronald Reagan (United States v. Hinckley, 1981). Although this case was fundamental in changing […] -
Juries, Witnesses, and Persuasion: A Brief Overview of the Science of Persuasion and Its Applications for Expert Witness Testimony
by Rebecca E. Velez and Tess M.S. Neal and Margaret Bull KoveraPosted on December 16, 2016 | 7 CommentsHere's a primer on persuasion--types of persuasion and how we use them presented by a group of academics and then trial consultants reactions. -
The Hidden Lives of Court Reporters
by Claire E. Moore and Stanley L. Brodsky, Ph.D. and David SamsPosted on December 16, 2016 | 3 CommentsWe all know they are omnipresent but what do those court reporters really think and experience? -
More Techniques for Uncovering Juror Bias before It’s Too Late
by Mykol C. Hamilton and Kate ZephyrhawkePosted on December 16, 2016 | 3 CommentsUncovering bias in change of venue surveys. -
![The use of expert witnesses has become commonplace within legal proceedings. As a result, research regarding how jurors perceive expert testimony has become of increasing importance. A variety of variables can influence juror perceptions of expert testimony, ranging from content-related variables (e.g., quality of the testimony, complexity of the testimony) […]](https://thejuryexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/FemaleExpert-201x130.png "Juror Perceptions of Women as Expert Witnesses: Suggestions for the Effects of Testimony Complexity, Gender-Intrusive Questioning, and Perceived Credibility")
Juror Perceptions of Women as Expert Witnesses: Suggestions for the Effects of Testimony Complexity, Gender-Intrusive Questioning, and Perceived Credibility
by Brittany P. BatePosted on April 20, 2016 | 2 CommentsThe use of expert witnesses has become commonplace within legal proceedings. As a result, research regarding how jurors perceive expert testimony has become of increasing importance. A variety of variables can influence juror perceptions of expert testimony, ranging from content-related variables (e.g., quality of the testimony, complexity of the testimony) […] -
![In her autobiography, Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlights emotion expression as a powerful persuasion tool—an argument that dates back to the 4th century B.C.E. (Aristotle, Rhetoric). Yet, expressing emotion has not always served her well. Her minority dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Michigan’s affirmative action ban (Schuette v. […]](https://thejuryexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/anger_invert-201x130.png "Expressing Anger Increases Male Jurors’ Influence, but Decreases Female Jurors’ Influence, During Mock Jury Deliberations")
Expressing Anger Increases Male Jurors’ Influence, but Decreases Female Jurors’ Influence, During Mock Jury Deliberations
by Jessica Salerno, Ph.D. and Liana Peter-Hagene, MA and Justin Sanchez, BAPosted on April 20, 2016 | 4 CommentsIn her autobiography, Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlights emotion expression as a powerful persuasion tool—an argument that dates back to the 4th century B.C.E. (Aristotle, Rhetoric). Yet, expressing emotion has not always served her well. Her minority dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Michigan’s affirmative action ban (Schuette v. […] -
Revealing Juror Bias Without Biasing Your Juror: Experimental Evidence For Best Practice Survey And Voir Dire Questions
by Mykol C. Hamilton, PhD and Kate Zephyrhawke, MAPosted on December 1, 2015 | 13 CommentsProspective jurors "know" the "right answer" to the questions on whether they can be fair and unbiased. But in this research, two academics show us how traditional voir dire and survey questions pose the question in a way that elicits a drastic under-reporting of individual biases. This article shows how to ask questions to help jurors acknowledge their biases (which we all have) in ways that does not shame them or make them feel like "bad people" for having biases. -
Do Trial Consultants Spell the End of Justice?
by Adam Benforado, J.D.Posted on August 28, 2015 | 1 CommentDo trial consultants spell the end of justice? Or the other way around? Or, perhaps, somewhere in the middle? -
Does Deposition Video Camera Angle Affect Witness Credibility?
by Chris Dominic, MA and Jeffrey W. Jarman, Ph.D. and Jonathan M. Lytle, Ph.D.Posted on May 31, 2015 | 15 CommentsDo different camera angles during deposition affect how observers will assess the credibility of the witness? Take a look at this research!